Archive for September, 2009

Web Hosting Review Site

Reviews are very important when searching out web hosting for your websites. When I was new to web hosting and looking for a reliable host, I made a few mistakes. Most of my web hosts have been outstanding– even some of the smaller companies I contracted with– but the best so far is Hostgator, in my opinion. I have a dozen blogs, and Hostgator has been able to handle them all, without a hitch.

Everyone’s hosting needs are different. You may desire “shared” hosting (your website is on a server along with dozens of others’ websites) or “dedicated” hosting (the server is basically all yours), or VPS hosting (VPS is “virtual private server”). See this outstanding article about the pros and cons of VPS hosting, as well as other excellent articles.

I recommend that you study up on web hosting and all the options and information that comes with it, BEFORE you make the leap. I know that if I had done so, I would have avoided a lot of hassles. The WebHostingGeeks.com website is full of very good articles and information about the world of web hosting (and more). I recommend it as a good start in understanding how web hosting works, and what will work for you. They also have reviews of popular web hosts, and a blog filled with tips and articles to make the most of your web hosting. Check them out, bookmark the site!

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]

Tags:

Twitter Storing All Tweets

This is interesting: Twitter stores all tweets. All of them. All the mindless drivel, the babble, the sponsored tweets, the quotations and witty sayings, the urls, the photos, the personal data. Forever, apparently. Or maybe just for two weeks. Who can know? The New York Times paints it as a good thing (“historical”), but I can see arenas of abuse for this.

Many people have worried that the inaccessibility of historical Twitter search results might mean that the messages weren’t being saved at all. Company co-founder Biz Stone told us otherwise by email today, though. Twitter is in fact saving all the tweets. You just can’t access them through search “right now.”

We wrote to Twitter to inquire about the company’s stated plans to scrub forthcoming geolocation data from messages after 14 days. That plan is said to be aimed at avoiding subpoenas, though the publishing of the location data at all is opt-in in the first place.

Scrubbed geolocation data after two weeks and no way to access historical information at all? That sounded like a pretty bum deal for a world-changing new communication platform. So we emailed to ask.

This was the reply we received from Biz Stone: “We definitely save all the tweets although you’re right in noting that our search focuses more on newer content right now. And yes, the plan is to drop the coordinates after 14 days.”

As with everything, you should never reveal sensitive personal information in a public forum, especially an Internet public forum, where data is harvested and stored indefinitely. Twitter’s own Terms of Service says:

Any information that you provide to Twitter is subject to our Privacy Policy, which governs our collection and use of your information. You understand that through your use of the Services you consent to the collection and use (as set forth in the Privacy Policy) of this information, including the transfer of this information to the United States and/or other countries for storage, processing and use by Twitter.

Why on earth Twitter would want to store data on every mommy blogger’s baby diaper change or every businessman’s restaurant tweet is beyond me. Unless Twitter has intentions of selling that data. Advertisers pay BIG money for such targeted data.

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]

Tags:

Beware of Clicking Twitter Links

It’s very risky to click on links, any links, be it in emails, in social networking sites, etc. A recent study said that there has been a 233% increase of malicious sites on the Internet, almost all propagating through social networking and emails. Yikes.

Twitter is especially susceptible to malicious clicking. Because urls are shortened for Twitter, the users cannot tell where the link is going. Who knows whether the link truly leads to Aunt Sally’s wedding dress, iscsi san or a worm? There are now several browser addons and such for detecting the origins of shortened urls, but still, it’s very difficult to know exactly where you are being led. And who knows what trojan, phishing scam, or virus awaits.

Symantec recently warned of the dangers of clicking links in Twitter:

The security software company released a warning and a video Friday on the dangers of clicking on the short URLs that link users from a tweet to a story, photo or video. Twitter isn’t the only place on the web users might find such shortened web addresses, but it is the most popular one.

The problem is that you don’t know where it will take you in most cases until you click on the link, something Symantec said malware authors have caught on to.

“Using enticing tweets and commonly used twitter search terms, their goal is to get other users to click on their links, leading to malicious code,” the Cupertino company said.

It offered examples with a YouTube video, which can be seen by clicking here.

The company said that in addition to its own security software, some browsers like Firefox and Internet Explorer allow users to check the full URL of a link before clicking on it.

“While this won’t tell you for sure if the link is malicious, it will at least allow you to look more carefully before clicking,” the company said in its post.

I heard in August that Twitter was starting to filter links that pass through their system, but I haven’t heard it directly from Twitter. Have you? Symantec published their statement about Twitter-clicking over the weekend, so I assume malicious links still pass through.

Nonetheless, please be careful what links you click!

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]

Tags:

A Green Online Quiz and More

Here’s an interesting website for your ecology and environment-minded individuals! It’s FreeYourFootprint. It has a cute (and free!) trivia game for eco-minded Internet surfers. For every question you answer correctly, FreeYourFootprint will offset one pound of C02 through planting trees! They purchase trees from the non-profit organization Trees for the Future. Check out the website for more details, and see how you score on the game. It’s a great way to get children involved in taking care of God’s good earth.

Photobucket

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]

Tags: ,

Premium Themes Becoming More Affordable

Surprise, surprise! Imagine my delight when shopping Theme Forest to see themes moderately priced! The themes there are very high quality, too. I’ve been generally dissatisfied with the “free” themes out there recently. Many are junk, many require Page Rank-sucking footer links, and others have small annoying quirks that bug me (like the sidebar loading first, before content– that’s awful!!). But Theme Forest has a nice selection, and the creators there seem to offer some support.

Going up on the scale is also WooThemes– $70 a theme, yikes! But they are promoting a “buy one, get one free” which is a little easier on the pocketbook. Brian Gardener’s themes are still expensive– $60 or more a pop. And then there’s the Thesis theme, which looks great, but at $87 is just too pricey.

I’m open to any suggestions on good themes, free or premium. I’ve grown weary of my themes and am looking for a change. Leave a comment if you have a suggestion!

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]

Tags: ,