<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: My Review of Roxio Creator 2010</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mrsmecombersscrapbook.com/2009/09/my-review-of-roxio-creator-2010.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mrsmecombersscrapbook.com/2009/09/my-review-of-roxio-creator-2010.html</link>
	<description>Talking technology, computers, and the Internet...  for the average computer user</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 06:21:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mrs. Mecomber</title>
		<link>http://mrsmecombersscrapbook.com/2009/09/my-review-of-roxio-creator-2010.html/comment-page-1#comment-9026</link>
		<dc:creator>Mrs. Mecomber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 16:30:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mrsmecombersscrapbook.com/?p=1327#comment-9026</guid>
		<description>Hi Jeff. If you are choosing a converter for email, then the quality of your images is going to be poor, no matter what. I have not used this feature of Roxio yet (I&#039;m not even halfway through what this software can do!!), but I do know that email image converters definitely lose quality, because by their very nature, email images are supposed to be degraded in quality-- this makes them easier to email (send through the Internet on limited bandwidth). If you&#039;re looking for higher-quality images and videos, I would try some other settings, and then perhaps use a zipping program to compress your finished results. 

Sorry I don&#039;t have much more to offer. Roxio has a good help page on their website. Another resource for finding help for your particular problem is to do a search with some keywords. I do that often. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jeff. If you are choosing a converter for email, then the quality of your images is going to be poor, no matter what. I have not used this feature of Roxio yet (I&#8217;m not even halfway through what this software can do!!), but I do know that email image converters definitely lose quality, because by their very nature, email images are supposed to be degraded in quality&#8211; this makes them easier to email (send through the Internet on limited bandwidth). If you&#8217;re looking for higher-quality images and videos, I would try some other settings, and then perhaps use a zipping program to compress your finished results. </p>
<p>Sorry I don&#8217;t have much more to offer. Roxio has a good help page on their website. Another resource for finding help for your particular problem is to do a search with some keywords. I do that often. <img src='http://mrsmecombersscrapbook.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff England</title>
		<link>http://mrsmecombersscrapbook.com/2009/09/my-review-of-roxio-creator-2010.html/comment-page-1#comment-9024</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff England</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 06:49:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mrsmecombersscrapbook.com/?p=1327#comment-9024</guid>
		<description>I just bought the Creator 2010 Pro package.  I was also impressed with the ease and intuitive nature of the VideoWave module.  But, I was surprised at the significant loss of video quality when I compare the output (MPG) to the input (MPG &amp; AVI video, &amp; JPG stills).  The output specs only offer me &quot;normal&quot; or something less for email.  Do you know how I can get sharper output -- at least as good as the input?

I wonder if this problem is related to my computer.  I&#039;m working on a Panasonic Toughbook laptop.  The software seems to have installed OK, and seems to run OK, but I wonder if my output quality is limited by my computer, which is probably not what a serious media type would be using.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just bought the Creator 2010 Pro package.  I was also impressed with the ease and intuitive nature of the VideoWave module.  But, I was surprised at the significant loss of video quality when I compare the output (MPG) to the input (MPG &amp; AVI video, &amp; JPG stills).  The output specs only offer me &#8220;normal&#8221; or something less for email.  Do you know how I can get sharper output &#8212; at least as good as the input?</p>
<p>I wonder if this problem is related to my computer.  I&#8217;m working on a Panasonic Toughbook laptop.  The software seems to have installed OK, and seems to run OK, but I wonder if my output quality is limited by my computer, which is probably not what a serious media type would be using.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mrs. Mecomber</title>
		<link>http://mrsmecombersscrapbook.com/2009/09/my-review-of-roxio-creator-2010.html/comment-page-1#comment-8911</link>
		<dc:creator>Mrs. Mecomber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 21:14:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mrsmecombersscrapbook.com/?p=1327#comment-8911</guid>
		<description>Thanks Lisa! Thanks to you, I am so happy with Roxio. And thanks to the generous people at Roxio, I am so grateful. They are really terrific, and they&#039;ve earned a very loyal fan!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Lisa! Thanks to you, I am so happy with Roxio. And thanks to the generous people at Roxio, I am so grateful. They are really terrific, and they&#8217;ve earned a very loyal fan!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

