RSS

“Smart Dust” Is Straight Goodness?!

These people are drunk– literally drunk– with power. This is shocking news, yet it’s being hailed as the next best thing to the atom bomb. It’s “smart dust”: teeny-tiny wireless sensors as small or smaller than a grain of rice, sent out across the planet with the intention on monitoring EVERYTHING.

‘Smart dust’ aims to monitor everything

Smart dust researchers say their theory of monitoring the world — however it’s realized — will benefit people and the environment.

More information is better information, Pister said.

“Having more sensors improves the efficiency of a system and reduces the demand and reduces waste,” he said. “So all of that is just straight goodness.”

Hartwell, the HP researcher, says the only way people can combat huge problems like climate change and biodiversity loss is to have more information about what’s going on.

“Frankly, I think we have to do it, from a sustainability and environmental standpoint,” he said.

Even though the first application of HP’s “Central Nervous System for the Earth” project will be commercial, Hartwell says the motives behind smart dust are altruistic.

“People ask me what my job is, and I say, well, I’m going to save the world,” he said…..

Even when deployed for science or the public, some people still get a Big Brother feeling –the uncomfortable sense of being under constant, secret surveillance — from the idea of putting trillions of monitors all over the world.

“It’s a very, very, very huge potential privacy invasion because we’re talking about very, very small sensors that can be undetectable, effectively,” said Lee Tien, an attorney at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a privacy advocate.

“They are there in such numbers that you really can’t do anything about them in terms of easy countermeasures.”

That doesn’t mean that researchers should stop working on smart dust. But they should be mindful of privacy as the work progresses, he said.

Pister said the wireless frequencies that smart dust sensors use to communicate — which work kind of like Wi-Fi — have security built into them. So the data is public only if the person or company that installed the sensor wants it to be, he said.

“Clearly, there are security concerns and privacy concerns,” he said, “and the good news is that when the radio technology was being developed for this stuff, it was shortly after all of the big concerns about Wi-Fi security. … We’ve got all the security tools we need underneath to make this information private.”

Further privacy concerns may arise if another vision for smart dust comes true. Some researchers are looking into making mobile phones into sensors.

In this scenario, the billions of people roaming the Earth with cell phones become the “smart dust.”

I don’t have “security” concerns, I have “tyrant” concerns. I’m sure when Wilbur and Orville Wright took off on that famous first flight at Kitty Hawk, they had no idea the destruction the contraption would mean to Nagasaki and Hiroshima residents. I’m sure when Remington invented his amazing gun, he didn’t do it for the sake of lusty warmongers with their AK-47s. Man ALWAYS twists “good technology” for evil purposes, without fail. But technology isn’t even being invented for good purposes anymore, to be twisted later. It’s being invented already twisted, to control as many people as possible. And for what cause? Why?

:( All very sad.

,

3 Responses to ““Smart Dust” Is Straight Goodness?!”

  1. NYCO Says:

    Don’t worry about it, Mrs M. Most stuff that gets talked about as “the next technological advance” will involve insane amounts of R&D, administrative, staffing, maintenance and other overhead costs that won’t be supportable for very long, if ever. Even the UK’s network of video surveillance cameras are the product of an economic boom that won’t be around forever (and may never be repeated).

    Please do read Joseph Tainter’s “Collapse of Complex Societies” sometime; it will ease your mind about the true longterm feasibility of many of these grandiose concepts.

  2. Mrs. Mecomber Says:

    I hope you’re correct (and perhaps you are). I have often wondered about the longevity of these proposed “complex societies.” However, there remains the consideration that these idiots just may attempt something like this, despite the probability of failure… Thanks for the book suggestion; I’ll check it out!

  3. Secondary Roads Says:

    Big government appears to be on the rise. Neither party has an exclusive on the phenomenon. Orwell was rushing the speed of complete takeover when he wrote 1984, but it is getting closer.