Google Deletes Blog Posts

Here’s another example of why any serious blogger– or even the casual blogger who cares for his blog– should consider leaving Blogger and going with one’s own domain and web host service.

Google Deletes Blogger Posts

Ryan Spaulding: Beginning last summer, I slowly began to notice that several older posts were beginning to disappear. This didn’t come to my attention for some time since I wasn’t in the habit of reading old posts except when I pulled down the material. Sometimes I received emails from frustrated readers who were looking for a topic I had written on – only to find the post deleted.

I had no reason to think this was anything other than a software glitch at first. There were no takedown notices or emails in my inbox. Then the instances began stacking up – and I began comparing notices with other bloggers. What was initially a series of seemingly unconnected blog post disappearances – by fall, became the topic of discussion in blogger emails and chat rooms. The change of tactic of the industry and the poor handling of it by blog-host Blogger (Google) was being seen as a conspiracy.

Have you contacted Google about the issue, and if so, what kind of response did you receive?

RS: They never responded. An “opportunity” (in legalese, of course) offered a means to have the post restored – but like most bloggers, I didn’t have the knowledge or time to fight “city hall” on every post. Especially, since Blogger/Google didn’t even take five minutes to send a simple email response. Nothing professional, nothing courteous. Again, the tactic they choose belies their basic lack of respect for their users – which is why I took up the cause. They have a relative monopoly on blog hosting services and rule with an iron fist.

OK– so Blogger (owned by the giant Google) is a free service. I started out with Blogger back when it was Blogspot, before Google, nearly ten years ago. LOVED it. But Google bought them out, they became Blogger, and, while some nifty stuff has been added to the software since then, there are lots of little grumblings along the blogosphere that cause some alarm. While no one’s ready to call out the Seattle injury lawyer against the company, it’s enough to make me move further away from Blogger. As a matter of fact, I am slowly extracting all my Blogger blogs away from Blogger and shifting them to my own domains and web hosting company. (I recommend Hostgator and the WordPress blogging software platform, by the way).

If you make money from your blog or blog about controversial topics (everything from politics to the recording industry), you are in jeaopardy of losing your posts and/or blog. These days, companies make you sign a EULA promising you won’t have “hate” or “offensive material” on your site. What constitutes “Hate” and “offensive material” is up to interpretation. These companies have REALLY screwy ideas of what constitutes as acceptable material, too –you can, for example, have nude photos of the latest celebrity or slanderous material about Jesus Christ, but you may be blogless if you post about monkeys and Barack Obama, or other “politically incorrect” content. Fact is, your content is more protected and 100% controlled by YOU when YOU pay for it and work on it yourself. A domain name is generally about $10 a year, and Hostgator hosting service is about $7 to $8 a month. You can easily recoup that by putting up affilate links or some other small-time advertising service, if you wish.

So, this is all one more warning to you Blogger users. Google is shifty– they aren’t going to blackball bloggers with one swift stroke (not yet, anyway). Their policy seems to be to eliminate small groups at a time, and then remain quiet when the small rush out outrage goes public. All the while, they are buying up the competition and squelching the dissent.

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]

Google Using Sponsored Posts

I haven’t seen too much of this circulating the Internet, despite it being pretty big news: Google is using sponsored posts to promote it’s search engine website in Asia. Story at TechCrunch.

Google is undoubtedly the dominant search engine globally, but in a few countries such as Korea (Naver), Russia (Yandex) or Japan, local competitors are winning. Especially Japan, the country with the world’s third biggest Internet population (about 100 million people are online), still seems to be a tough nut to crack for Google.

…the Japanese blogosphere… is filled with reports about Google hiring Cyberbuzz, a Tokyo-based Internet marketing company to promote the keyword feature (its widget version) with a pay-per-post campaign. And in fact, the search string “Google Hot Keywords Ranking+Blog Widget+CyberBuzz” in Japanese in Google’s own Blog Search leads to a few dozen results, indicating the reports aren’t made up of thin air. This blogger, for example, integrated the keyword widget and praises the list as being very useful to be kept up-to-date on what is going on in the world. This one says the keywords change every 20 minutes and that the new Google feature once quickly helped in obtaining information on a Japanese TV star. All postings end with a disclosure that says: “I am taking part in the Cyberbuzz campaign”.

You see, the big news is that in the United States, Google slashed the PageRank of websites and blogs that did sponsored posts, going on a rampage against the sponsored post industry– in particular, against PayPerPost, the most publicized sponsored post company. Google targeted “Posties” by slashing their PageRank, rendering their blogs nearly worthless to a certain demographic of advertisers, which of course affected the bloggers’ blogs and their paychecks. Google took a higher “moral” stance on websites with sponsored posts.

And now, here’s Google, creating and paying bloggers to write sponsored posts for THEM. $100 a post for some of them! Unbelievable. No, really– believable. I don’t for one moment believe that Google slashed PageRank because they were concerned about the purity of the blogosphere. Googles was doing it for DA MONEY. Sponsored posts and other TLAs interfere with Google’s bottom line, which is, of course, their top priority.

JERKS!!

And they do it in Asia, where more users are using Yahoo’s search engine for finding stuff like Bamboo shades, than using Google. So when the rubber meets the road, Google takes their self-proclaimed “low” road.

GRR!! I’m amazed that too few people are blogging about this. This is big news. This is more proof that shows what hypocrites and power-mongers sit in Mountain View, CA. :-p

P.S. There’s another good story about the fiasco here. Apparently, after Google was caught red-handed, Google apologized and slashed the PageRank on GoogleJapan for the sponsored posts– from a PR9 to 5!

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]

Google is Watching You. Really.

*groan*

I know there will be knuckleheads and Google cheerleaders who will rabidly support anything the New Big Brother (aka Google) will do, but Google’s new Latitude REALLY is taking things way, way too far. This is just BAD.

The company plans to launch software called Latitude on Wednesday that lets mobile phone users share their location with close contacts. Google hopes it will help people find each other while out and about and to keep track of loved ones.

“What Google Latitude does is allow you to share that location with friends and family members, and likewise be able to see friends and family members’ locations,” said Steve Lee, product manager for Google Latitude. For example, a girlfriend could use it to see if her boyfriend has arrived at a restaurant and, if not, how far away he is.

Of course, Latitude opens up people to all sorts of problems– with technology come problems, remember? While there is nothing wrong with using the Internet to look for insurance online quotes or locating local offices… but “tagging” individuals to track their location and movement? COME ON! and what’s worse- people are opting to do it themselves! UGH! Next thing you know, they’ll all be implanting us with their RFID chips and tagging us, so that we can’t buy anything or sell anything without them knowing! Oh yeah… that’s gonna happen, anyway… for some. :S

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]

Cloud Computing?

I don’t like the sounds of this. Google (surprise, surprise) intends to wipe out the concept of the personal computer by creating and hosting a service where everyone’s files and data are in a central location.

Google is to launch a service that would enable users to access their personal computer from any internet connection, according to industry reports. But campaigners warn that it would give the online behemoth unprecedented control over individuals’ personal data.

The Google Drive, or “GDrive”, could kill off the desktop computer, which relies on a powerful hard drive. Instead a user’s personal files and operating system could be stored on Google’s own servers and accessed via the internet.

Just as we have our photos on Flickr and Picasa, our email on Yahoo and Hotmail, and etc, we would now have all our stuff on hard drives far away. Hosted by Google.

The odd thing is that the journalist of the article speaks as if Google is about to launch the GDrive (as this is called), or at least start developing it… then at the end of the article, there is this:

Google refused to confirm the GDrive, but acknowledged the growing demand for cloud computing. Dave Armstrong, head of product and marketing for Google Enterprise, said: “There’s a clear direction … away from people thinking, ‘This is my PC, this is my hard drive,’ to ‘This is how I interact with information, this is how I interact with the web.’”

I really like to have ownership of my information. While I may have email on Yahoo and my photos on Flickr, I have my own copies of these files and prefer to keep it that way. Accessing my data from anywhere at any time on the Internet is great, but I do still want my local control of my own data. What do you think of it? Would you go for this?

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]

Tracking the Flu’s Spread

Creeepy. As much as I like demographics, this still creeps me out: Google is using web searches to track the spread of the flu. In other words, spying. On people, who use Google, for web searches. And then making it into a huge spreadsheet, in a way.

Turns out a lot of ailing Americans enter phrases like “flu symptoms” into Google and other search engines before they call their doctors.

That simple act, multiplied across millions of keyboards in homes around the country, has given rise to a new early warning system for fast-spreading flu outbreaks, called Google Flu Trends.

Tests of the new Web tool from Google.org, the company’s philanthropic unit, suggest that it may be able to detect regional outbreaks of the flu a week to 10 days before they are reported by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

In early February, for example, the C.D.C. reported that the flu cases had recently spiked in the mid-Atlantic states. But Google says its search data show a spike in queries about flu symptoms two weeks before that report was released. Its new service at google.org/flutrends analyzes those searches as they come in, creating graphs and maps of the country that, ideally, will show where the flu is spreading.

The C.D.C. reports are slower because they rely on data collected and compiled from thousands of health care providers, labs and other sources. Some public health experts say the Google data could help accelerate the response of doctors, hospitals and public health officials to a nasty flu season, reducing the spread of the disease and, potentially, saving lives.

But does this leave room for error? I mean, what if Americans watched a television show about the flu? And then they went on the Internet and searched for more information. It’s very easy to make an assumption that people have the flu. Who can tell?

I don’t like the unreliability of these things. There are too many variables and there’s too much to lose (like freedom, if there is a quarantine) if things go wrong, which they usually do.

Still, some public health officials note that many health departments already use other approaches, like gathering data from visits to emergency rooms, to keeping daily tabs on disease trends in their communities.

“We don’t have any evidence that this is more timely than our emergency room data,” said Dr. Farzad Mostashari, assistant commissioner of the Department of Health and Mental Hygiene in New York City.

Hmmm.

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]

Google Launches Blog Tracking Service

Yep, Google is in the news again. And they’ve got a new thing going again. They’ve created a blog tracking service, which is basically a listing of blogs that Googlebot has crawled, and presents blog discussions by topics. For example, let’s say you wanted to know what bloggers were saying about a particular acne treatment; you’d enter the information and Google would give you a listing of everyone who’s talking about it, and when.

“Did you know that millions of bloggers around the world write new posts each week?” Google product manager Michael Cohen wrote in an Internet posting of his own.

“We’re pleased to launch a new homepage for Google Blog Search so that you too can browse and discover the most interesting stories in the blogosphere.”

The Northern California company applied technology from its Google News website to separate blog postings into clusters based on topics, stories or events.

I don’t like the sound of “tracking service.” Really, it’s more like a realtime topical index of blogs. It’s bad public relations and kind of creepy to use “tracking” in anything anymore.

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]
Posted in blogs, Google, news. Tags: , , . Comments Off »