Twitter Storing All Tweets

This is interesting: Twitter stores all tweets. All of them. All the mindless drivel, the babble, the sponsored tweets, the quotations and witty sayings, the urls, the photos, the personal data. Forever, apparently. Or maybe just for two weeks. Who can know? The New York Times paints it as a good thing (“historical”), but I can see arenas of abuse for this.

Many people have worried that the inaccessibility of historical Twitter search results might mean that the messages weren’t being saved at all. Company co-founder Biz Stone told us otherwise by email today, though. Twitter is in fact saving all the tweets. You just can’t access them through search “right now.”

We wrote to Twitter to inquire about the company’s stated plans to scrub forthcoming geolocation data from messages after 14 days. That plan is said to be aimed at avoiding subpoenas, though the publishing of the location data at all is opt-in in the first place.

Scrubbed geolocation data after two weeks and no way to access historical information at all? That sounded like a pretty bum deal for a world-changing new communication platform. So we emailed to ask.

This was the reply we received from Biz Stone: “We definitely save all the tweets although you’re right in noting that our search focuses more on newer content right now. And yes, the plan is to drop the coordinates after 14 days.”

As with everything, you should never reveal sensitive personal information in a public forum, especially an Internet public forum, where data is harvested and stored indefinitely. Twitter’s own Terms of Service says:

Any information that you provide to Twitter is subject to our Privacy Policy, which governs our collection and use of your information. You understand that through your use of the Services you consent to the collection and use (as set forth in the Privacy Policy) of this information, including the transfer of this information to the United States and/or other countries for storage, processing and use by Twitter.

Why on earth Twitter would want to store data on every mommy blogger’s baby diaper change or every businessman’s restaurant tweet is beyond me. Unless Twitter has intentions of selling that data. Advertisers pay BIG money for such targeted data.

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]

Beware of Clicking Twitter Links

It’s very risky to click on links, any links, be it in emails, in social networking sites, etc. A recent study said that there has been a 233% increase of malicious sites on the Internet, almost all propagating through social networking and emails. Yikes.

Twitter is especially susceptible to malicious clicking. Because urls are shortened for Twitter, the users cannot tell where the link is going. Who knows whether the link truly leads to Aunt Sally’s wedding dress, iscsi san or a worm? There are now several browser addons and such for detecting the origins of shortened urls, but still, it’s very difficult to know exactly where you are being led. And who knows what trojan, phishing scam, or virus awaits.

Symantec recently warned of the dangers of clicking links in Twitter:

The security software company released a warning and a video Friday on the dangers of clicking on the short URLs that link users from a tweet to a story, photo or video. Twitter isn’t the only place on the web users might find such shortened web addresses, but it is the most popular one.

The problem is that you don’t know where it will take you in most cases until you click on the link, something Symantec said malware authors have caught on to.

“Using enticing tweets and commonly used twitter search terms, their goal is to get other users to click on their links, leading to malicious code,” the Cupertino company said.

It offered examples with a YouTube video, which can be seen by clicking here.

The company said that in addition to its own security software, some browsers like Firefox and Internet Explorer allow users to check the full URL of a link before clicking on it.

“While this won’t tell you for sure if the link is malicious, it will at least allow you to look more carefully before clicking,” the company said in its post.

I heard in August that Twitter was starting to filter links that pass through their system, but I haven’t heard it directly from Twitter. Have you? Symantec published their statement about Twitter-clicking over the weekend, so I assume malicious links still pass through.

Nonetheless, please be careful what links you click!

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]
Posted in Internet, news, security news. Tags: . 3 Comments »

An iPod and Macbook Giveaway From NetFirms

Oooo would I just LOVE to win a MacBook. I’ve been on the prowl for various giveaways lately. And here’s one that practically dropped into my lap this morning: the Netfirms contest that’s got an iPod Touch and a MacBook as prizes, up to $1800 in value!

In a nutshell, here’s how to enter the giveaway (yes, it requires a little work, but isn’t a MacBook worth it?!:

>> In Twitter, send this tweet: “Win a #free iPod Touch or Macbook from the @Netfirms #contest. Domain registration services via Twitter http://bit.ly/yJfJK” and it counts as one entry. Plus, one RT (Retweet) equals one entry per day.

OR

>> Register a domain name through Netfirms Twitter Domain Registration service for $7.99 (that’s a great price, by the way), and that counts as one entry. How you do this is: Register your Twitter username to your Netfirms Control Panel (you have to have an existing account or create a new one). Then, through Twitter, send NetFirms a DM (Direct Message), asking them to register a new domain for you. They will automatically register it and bill you if the domain name is available. NetFirms will send you a confirmation via DM, and your new domain is set to go! This is a great way to register a new (and inexpensive) domain and enter a contest at the same time. They’ve got a quick How-To video on how to enter via SMS:

>> The NetFirms Giveaway is running from September 9, 2009 to October 7, 2009.

See the Netfirms contest page for more details and rules and regulations.

Post?slot_id=47461&url=http%3a%2f%2fsocialspark

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]
Posted in blogs, Internet, Twitter, websites. Tags: , , , , . Comments Off »

Serious Twitter Vulnerability Still Not Fixed

If you Twitter, this news article will very of significant importance to you. Basically, there’s a security vulnerability with the Twitter software/website, where a hacker could easily gain control of your account. Twitter announced a fix for the vulnerability a few weeks ago, but apparently it didn’t work. This is from eWeek:

A cross-site scripting vulnerability affecting Twitter security is still open despite the microblogging service’s attempt at a fix, a software developer says. If exploited, the bug could enable an attacker to take over a victim’s Twitter account.

A software developer is claiming Twitter’s fix for a critical cross-site scripting bug is no good, meaning users are still vulnerable to an attack that could allow an attacker to take over their accounts.

The bug was first reported by techie James Slater. According to Slater, the vulnerability allows malicious JavaScript to be inserted into tweets by adding the code to a field of the API used by Twitter developers. By embedding links in tweets, developers can direct Twitter users to their Websites.

More information on the Twitter vulnerability can be found here. At the heart of the issue seems to be that Twitter’s API does not filter malicious URLs.

“Twitter made one of the most basic mistakes in developing Web applications—never blindly trust data that is provided from the outside world! Their form did no—or some very, very basic—checking on what you enter in the box,” Slater wrote.

He said although Twitter claimed to have fixed the problem after he pointed it in a blog post Aug. 25, the fix did not address the issue.

“With a few minutes’ work, someone with a bit of technical expertise could make a Twitter ‘application’ and start sending tweets with it … it can be arranged so that if another Twitter user so much as sees one of these tweets—and they are logged in to Twitter—their account could be taken over,” Slater wrote.

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]
Posted in crime, Internet, news, security news. Tags: , , . Comments Off »

BREAKING NEWS: 40% Twitters are Meaningless!

:ermm:

That comes as a surprise to some people? Hello?

Forty percent of the messages on Twitter are “pointless babble” along the lines of “I am eating a sandwich now,” according to a study conducted by a US market research firm.

Pear Analytics, based in San Antonio, Texas, said that it randomly sampled 2,000 messages from the public stream of Twitter and separated them into six categories.

The categories were: news, spam, self-promotion, pointless babble, conversational and pass-along value.

Pear said “pointless babble” accounted for 811 “tweets” or 40.55 percent of the total number of messages sampled.

Where has this guy been? They needed a study to determine this?! I hope it wasn’t taxpayer funded! Because ALL you have to do is watch the Twitter tutorial video produced by the Twitter folks, and it’s a NO BRAINER. Twitter was created to be a mindless bastion of meaningless, frivolous banter.

Holy cow, just wait til Twitter ads come out in full force…. you guys ain’t seen nothing yet. :blink:

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]
Posted in news. Tags: . 5 Comments »

Twitter Tools: HugeFollowing

I’ve been on Twitter for a good two weeks, and already I’m “speaking the language.” And I’m discovering that a healthy roster of followers gets the attention of affiliates, marketers, and advertisers (not to mention that you get to meet and know some really neat people!). Therefore, Twitter is becoming more diverse, as people look for ways to monetize their accounts; it is a very, VERY difficult task, I think. But without a doubt, what necessary (whether you monetize anything or not) is gaining a large and diverse group of “followers,” or those who await with baited breath your every TWEET!

Well, it’s not THAT exciting. :D But having a lot of followers is neat. If nothing else, you feel great because you’re so popular! And if you’re trying to monetize your online social networking, well, you just can’t do it without a following.

I’ve come across various schemes, ploys, and Twitter groups that help you promote yourself and gain more followers. Such is the new group, Huge Following. This is from their website:

Huge Following helps you get more Followers on Twitter. To Join: Login via the Twitter Login box above and then Follow 20 Random Regular Users and All VIP Users. You are then added to Huge Following and everytime someone logs in, you have a chance of appearing as one of the random 20 accounts that they must follow. If you want to be added EVERY time someone logins in, then buy a VIP package and you will be added every single time! Login to your account to find more information about VIP Accounts.

Sounds reasonable. A Regular Account is free, so for the average Twitterer (like me), it’s a great way to get the word out about what wonderful and inspiring tweets you toot. And if you are serious about becoming a master Twitterer, the VIP program has what it takes. It will be interesting to see how Huge Following develops. Let me know if you decide to join. We can follow each other. :)

Post?slot_id=44195&url=http%3a%2f%2fsocialspark

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]